![]() ![]() But in this case, only the deviation from the index without SYSmark and without Cinebench (or other rendering software) is in the point of view. To use this new index is clearly in favor of Intel, because usually you would use the original index with all the test results for any performance consideration. Intel's SYSmark 2018 results showing some very much different results, so as second I investigate the deviation of SYSmark's and Cinebench's results from the new performance index without any rendering software. In fact, even without rendering benchmarks, every single review still see a huge performance advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900X at application performance. ![]() Not a single review claims a performance advantage for Core i7-9700K and/or Core i9-9900K over Ryzen 9 3900X at application performance. ![]() Core i7-9700K and Core i9-9900K are still far away from the performance level of Ryzen 9 3900X at applications. Yes, the rendering software is in favor of AMD, but the results from all other tests are not so different. You can easily see that removing the rendering benchmarks change not much. The base (100%) for all results is the Ryzen 9 3900X, so you can compare it to Intel's claims: On the left side of the following table you see the original index (including the results from rendering benchmarks), on the right side of the table the new index without any of the rendering benchmark. The new index include mostly office, browser, packer and encoding software. without of 3D Studio, Blender, Cinebench, Corona, FryBench, Indigo, KeyShot, LuxMark, PCMark rendering test, POV-Ray & V-Ray. First, I created an application performance index without any of the rendering software, i.e. On the other side, Intel dismiss the Cinebench benchmark as too much in favor of AMD's CPUs, calling the Cinebench results as outliers in review of other benchmarks.Īs we have a bunch of independent benchmarks from the Ryzen 3000 launch, it's easy to check Intel's claims. Intel claims as well a performance advantage for Core i7-9700K (+3%) and Core i9-9900K (+7%) over Ryzen 9 3900X at the SYSmark 2018, called it a benchmark win at application performance. Within this presentation, Intel promote "SYSmark 2018" as the best benchmark to test application performance, because SYSmark include some widely used programs like Office & Adobe software. XFastest ( Google-translated to english) showing some of the Intel "Real Usage Guidelines" presentation slides, mostly interesting is slide #17. According to PCGamesN, Intel speaks with the press (and probably with it's OEM partners) about "real world" benchmarking and providing "Real Usage Guidelines" (RUG) for that. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |